🚨 Google's AI Mistake: Wrongly Blames Airbus for Boeing Crash!
🤯 “How Is Airbus Not Suing Google?” — Big AI Error Raises Questions
A major mistake by Google's AI has sparked outrage and confusion across the internet. It all began when a Reddit user spotted a shocking inaccuracy in the AI Overview displayed on Google following the tragic crash of an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner in Ahmedabad on June 12, 2025.
The user searched for "last Airbus fatal crash," and Google's AI returned a completely incorrect summary. According to the AI, the crash involved an Airbus A330-243 and claimed that the aircraft was operating an Air India flight that crashed shortly after takeoff, killing many on board.
However, this was completely false information - the aircraft involved in the crash was a Boeing, not an Airbus. The flight in question was actually operated by a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, making the AI’s statement not only incorrect but also highly misleading.
The error quickly went viral, leading many to question the reliability of AI-generated content, especially when displayed so confidently in Google's search results.
📸 The Screenshot That Went Viral
The controversy gained momentum after a Reddit user shared a screenshot showing a misleading AI Overview from Google Search. The AI-generated summary confidently claimed:
“The most recent fatal Airbus crash occurred on Thursday, June 12, 2025, in India, involving an Air India flight. The plane crashed shortly after takeoff in Ahmedabad... involving an Airbus A330-243...”
This statement immediately drew attention - not just because it was incorrect, but because of how specific and authoritative it sounded. The mention of a specific aircraft model, date, airline, and location made it seem like a well-researched fact. ✍️📅
But the truth was far from it. The actual aircraft involved in the crash was a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner ✈️, not an Airbus A330-243 ❌. This critical error in such a high-profile incident raised serious concerns about the accuracy of AI-generated content 🤖⚠️, especially when shown in a trusted space like Google’s top search results 🔍.
The screenshot quickly went viral 📸 across platforms like Reddit, X (formerly Twitter), and tech forums 💻, with users expressing disbelief at how such a fundamental mistake could appear so prominently without fact-checking 🧠❗
😡 Social Media Reacts
This blunder didn’t sit well with users across the internet 🌐. As soon as the screenshot surfaced, people took to Reddit, X (formerly Twitter), and other platforms to express their frustration 😤 and concern about the reliability of AI-generated content.
🗨️ “Google should NOT be showing AI Overviews like this if they can’t even get basic facts right!” - one user wrote, criticizing the placement of unverified AI responses at the top of search results.
🗨️ “This is why AI needs stronger fact checks. One mistake and it spreads like wildfire.” - another pointed out, highlighting the speed at which misinformation can go viral 🔥.
🗨️ “How is Airbus not suing Google for this? It wrongly blames them for a deadly crash.” - echoed a third, emphasizing the seriousness of falsely accusing a company in such a sensitive situation ⚖️💥.
The overall sentiment was clear: while AI tools like Google’s Overview feature are meant to provide quick answers ⚡, presenting them so confidently without robust verification systems can be dangerous ☠️. Many users called for more transparency 🔍 and accountability 🧾, especially when the AI’s words can impact public perception, reputations, and even legal matters ⚖️.
As criticism mounted 📈, Google quickly took action by manually removing the inaccurate AI Overview from search results 🚫.
📢 Their official statement:
“This response is no longer showing. We make continuous improvements and use cases like this to update our systems. Our AI Overviews are held to a high-quality bar.”
In response to the widespread criticism, Google acknowledged the mistake 🧯 and took quick corrective action 🔧. The company manually removed the misleading AI-generated result from its search platform 🖥️. In its statement, Google emphasized that such incidents are taken seriously and that user feedback and real-world errors like this help them improve the system further 🔄.
Google also noted that the accuracy of its AI Overviews is generally comparable to its "Featured Snippets" 📌 - the highlighted answers often displayed at the top of search results. However, this event exposed just how crucial it is to have stronger oversight, particularly when dealing with real-world tragedies 😔.
🛫 What Actually Happened?
The real tragedy behind all this involved Flight AI171, operated by Air India, which was scheduled to fly from Ahmedabad to London on June 12, 2025 📆. The aircraft, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, crashed shortly after takeoff from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport 🛫🔥.
Sadly, out of the 242 people on board - 230 passengers and 12 crew members 😢 - only one person survived the horrific incident 💔. The crash has been described as one of the deadliest in recent Indian aviation history ⚰️📰.
This catastrophic event added to the emotional weight of the AI mistake 🧠💣, as it involved real lives and a grieving nation 🕯️. That’s why the error sparked not just technical criticism, but also ethical and emotional reactions across the internet 🌍.
⚠️ Final Thoughts
This incident highlights the serious risks of relying on AI-generated information 🚨 - especially in sensitive situations like fatal accidents 🛬💀. When incorrect facts are presented with confidence, they can mislead the public and harm reputations 🎭.
Even tech giants like Google aren’t immune to these errors 🏢❗, which is why fast action and accountability are crucial 🕵️♂️✅.
✈️ As AI becomes more integrated into search and news, stronger fact-checking ✅ and human oversight 👥 aren’t just important - they’re necessary. The stakes are simply too high for mistakes like this 🎯.
SOURCE:NDTV.com
1. Itstrending.in-Ahmedabad Boeing plane Crash
2. Itstrending.in-Sarvam Ai
3. Itstrending.in-Google Veo 3
4. Itstrending.in-Google Beam
5. Itstrending.in-OpenAi Codex
6. Itstrending.in-NotebookLM
